Is there a recreational way to teach how ecosystems work? The destructive and wasteful “economies” we’re always propping up with bail-outs and interest-rate cuts are man-made, but it’s still air, water, soil and sunlight, and the plants and animals they support, that ultimately keep us alive. Our failure to understand natural systems is a kind of cultural illness, but zoos might be a good venue for applying a remedy.

In my first visit there in a couple years, on Thanksgiving weekend, I petted a ray (the fish, dog-like, seemed to enjoy it) and got my first glimpse of seadragons — fantastic sea-horse relatives that resemble elegantly floating sprigs of seaweed. And I felt my inevitable ambivalence about cooping close human relatives like orangs and gorillas in boxes. But mostly, I wondered how the zoo might help visitors understand how nature uses all its resources, recycling endlessly to keep things in balance.

Of course, this is inherently difficult for zoos: Animals who mixed there as in the wild would dampen revenue by eating each other, for one thing. And while the synthetic flooring, “foliage” and swimming pools that frame most exhibits are easy to maintain, they give scant sense of how, for instance, a forest processes rainwater.

Granted, displays like the one at the tiger exhibit have long noted how habitat destruction threatens animals with extinction. And there’s an old monkey-house display that warns of the consequences of bulldozing rainforests for ranches and farms (even though, when I visited, the display’s digital lost-acreage ticker — perhaps exhausted from the effort — had stopped counting.)

Some newer displays showed more promise. For instance, the aquarium, in collaboration with groups like The Seahorse Project, bore a detailed sign about global overfishing of the oceans and — rather remarkably — basically told people not to eat most shrimp (it’s harvested unsustainably) and to lobby government for marine parks, to preserve habitat. Meanwhile, the updated polar bear exhibit offered pamphlets pushing ocean-friendly fish consumption; a sign explaining how petrochemicals like PCBs enter the food web and accumulate in predators like polar bears … and people; and displays about how emissions from our fossil-fuel consumption is dooming polar bears through climate change.

There’s a lot more to be done, and schools, of course, must do the lion’s share. But in some ways, zoos, as places of fun, can probably instruct more effectively. If delightful sights — baby elephants wrasslin’ each other; penguins torpedoing through the water in the perpetual dark of a simulated Antarctic winter — can make us empathize with individual species, they ought to be an inroad for teaching about the whole web of life, too. Even today, and even when they emphasize saving species and habitats, zoos seldom say why those things are more than exercises in sentiment, or asthetics. Too seldom do they tell us that the tigers, polar bears and seahorses are canaries in the coal mine — and that we live in the same mine.

3 replies on “The Pittsburgh Zoo & PPG Aquarium”

  1. Bill,
    Hi, It’s Connie George from the Zoo. Thanks for noticing the educational interpretives at the Aquarium and Water’s Edge. You can see that as we update with new exhibits we are finding new ways to inform the public about what impact they can have on the conservation of wildlife, and most importantly, habitats. Many of the animals that live at the Zoo are charismatic ambassadors for other species that live in their habitats. Taking conservation measures for them, turns out to help many animal and plant species. We are now struggling with determining more effective ways to educate and communicate – in addition to static signage. Many people walk right by the signs or take only a second to read them.

    This summer, we conducted a survey of our visitors to determine whether they would be willing to rent hand-held devices, download podcasts, or if they would be willing to use text messaging to learn about the animals. More than 50 percent said they would. They are also interested in interactive kiosks. Some of this is easily provided by the Zoo and will be implemented by next summer. Other ideas, such as kiosks, require a larger investment, especially when you factor in the investment needed to weatherproof the technology. We’re getting there! But in the meantime, anything new that we build incorporates as much educational information as possible.

    Your article tells me you are noticing the transition and it can’t happen soon enough for the many people who are passionate about conservation here at the Zoo. Happy Holidays!
    Connie George
    Director of Marketing and PR
    Pittsburgh Zoo & PPG Aquarium

  2. Wait a minute, this is an article about caring for animals and the environment that promotes the imprisonment of wild animals in zoos for human enjoyment and entertainment?

    Think about that…

    Ecosystems do not work by taking wild animals, putting them in pens and cages, and/or making them do tricks for people. Just a thought.

  3. Just replying to Animalia Libero — I agree on some level, and my post does note my unease with imprisoning wild animals, as well as the impossibility of depicting living ecosystems in a synthetic setting. I would much prefer that people learn about nature by spending a few hours in the woods.
    On the other hand, as long as zoos are with us, they can help raise awareness about endangered habitats and organisms that it might be easy for people to forget about otherwise. (People wouldn’t show up for the tiger exhibit, or feel the same way about tigers, if the exhibit consisted solely of signage, or even video.) My main point isn’t to argue for zoos, but to say that zoos could do a better job teaching about ecosystems, even if they can’t replicate them.

Comments are closed.