To note: the publicist asked me to remove the post on Misra's website and I complied. Nonetheless, as a musician, label manager, and writer, I do feel strongly about this. I'd say that being provided a track list and bio, along with a physical promo, leaves the responsibility squarely on Paste's shoulders, regardless of how the one Forcefield promo was "tagged."
iTunes is not fail-safe (some folks' iTunes download backwards) and, in the digital age, this is something that needs to be realized if you're writing a review. Failing to read the track list that accompanies a digital promo (which the writer clearly did) is lazy journalism and unacceptable from an entity as powerful as Paste. I stand by that. Paste themselves immediately realized this and were extremely apologetic.
The main premise of all this: if a band and label spend painstaking hours on a release, please just spend a little time and care with your review. It can make a huge difference.
I do not subscribe to the notion that writers should wholly trust digital technology and fail to take the time to read the carefully constructed material that accompanies promos. I love you guys and I love Pittsburgh (a lot), but I don't believe that's a good stance to take.
Sign up for Daily Rundown and get the freshest content sent right to your inbox.
Pittsburgh City Paper
Website powered by Foundation
National Advertising by VMG Advertising