I'm another old timer who has long covered the issues inherent in the Takos case. By degrees,I know most of the people involved.
Bosetti is a hard head who has never run with the pack. He is literate and principled. Lucinski is bright, savvy and obsessive. Since Bosetti testified for the defense retaliation has come in the form of a smear campaign by Lucinski and friends within the department. The defaming lies and rumors can be dealt with, but it's hard to unring a bell; and "hot dog" cops tempt fate by throwing stones in a glass house.
In 2000 Lucinski was assigned to a three person wagon crew,the other two officers refused to go along with her tactics and asked to be reassigned. Lucinski claimed that they weren't aggressive enough either.
It is true that Bosetti is 64 with some age related issues and will retire soon. It's also true that he doesn't make many arrests. Like most older officers he defers arrests to others who are eager for court time. It doesn't matter which cop makes the arrest-as long as mutual consent and due process are observed. Also: CP didn't distinguish between generic discretion and the legal term, "abuse of discretion." Lucinski announced on radio that she would "take the arrest (for a medical call)that had been assigned to another cop, before any officer had even arrived on scene to assess.
Re: the affadavit; not telling the DA issuing a warrant or summons that another officer was assigned the call, that "Miranda" was in play because statements had been made and taken is a material omission that another Pittsburgh cop has recently been charged with. Bosetti was defending due process and his pension, not drunks. Did PGH pay millions for a federal decree that can't stop misconduct?
CP reports that in the past Bosetti has denounced police brass and reform groups. More accurately; he's denounced the tactics of some brass, some activists and some FOP board members. But he has consistently supported principle.
Ironically, last week Lucinski was showing-off a supportive e-mail she'd received from former Chief McNeilly. It was McNeilly who ordered former Asst.Chief (and current Chief) Nate Harper to investigate only administrative flaws, not any criminality, in the infamous Charmo/Jackson case.
The Takos case shows that reform will not come by federal decree, it will come only when character trumps "business as usual." Don't hold your breath.
Pittsburgh City Paper
Website powered by Foundation
National Advertising by VMG Advertising